Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://hea.iki.rssi.ru/integral06/papers/B06_Iyudin01-29Jan07_13:07:48.pdf Дата изменения: Mon Jan 29 13:07:48 2007 Дата индексирования: Mon Oct 1 23:22:36 2012 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: m 1

MULTIWAVELENGTH APPEARANCE OF VELA JR.: IS IT UP TO EXPECTATIONS?
Anatoli F. Iyudin1 , B. Aschenbach2 , V. Burwitz2 , K. Dennerl2 , M. Freyberg2, F. Haberl2 , and M. Filipovic
1 3

Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Vorob'evy Gory, 119992 Moscow, Russian Federation 2 Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312, D-85741 Garching, Germany Ё 3 CSIRO Australia Telescope National Facility, PO Box 76, Epping NSW1710, Australia; University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, DC, NSW 1797, Australia

ABSTRACT Vela Jr. is one of the youngest and likely nearest among the known galactic supernova remnants (SNRs). Discovered in 1997 it has been studied since then at quite a few wavelengths, that spread over almost 20 decades in energy. Here we present and discuss Vela Jr. properties revealed by these multiwavelength observations, and confront them with the SNR model expectations. Questions that remained unanswered at the time of publication of the paper of Iyudin et al. [25], e.g. what is the nature of the SNR's proposed central compact source CXOU J085201.4-461753, and why is the ISM absorption column density apparently associated with RX J0852.0-4622 much greater than the typical column the Vela SNR, can be addressed using the latest radio and X-ray observations of Vela Jr.. These results, as well as other related questions we will be addressed in the following. Key words: galactic supernova remnants; radio, optical, and X-ray emission; nucleosynthesis; -ray lines.

of the nearest supernova in recent history [3] with a best estimate for the distance of 200 pc and an age of 680 years. The detection of 44 Ti in Cas A [17, 18] has been supported by the Beppo-SAX measurements of the 68 and 78 keV X-ray lines [50] which are produced in the first decay of 44 Ti in the decay chain 44 Ti44 Sc44 Ca, and recently by IBIS/ISGRI [38, 51]. The detection of the 1.157 MeV -ray line from Cas A was the first discovery of 44 Ti in a young galactic SNR, and as such it provides an essential calibration of nucleosynthesis model calculations. With the discovery of RX J0852.0-4622/GRO J0852-4642 we may have a second example, which still needs the confirmation by independent measurements. SN1987A might be the third case of strong 44 Ti line emission, which can be probed in the future by more sensitive -ray instruments. Multiple observations of Vela Jr. in the radio band confirmed the shell-like structure and supported the identification of RX J0852.0-4622 as a SNR [8,11,12,13,14,16,46]. Furthermore a good correlation between X-ray and radio brightness was found (c.f. Fig. 1). X-ray spectra of this SNR taken with ROSAT, ASCA, Chandra and XMM-Newton are well described by a power law [3,4,22,33,44,48]. The best-fit with a single power law results in an interstellar absorption column density of 3.9в1021 cm-2 which is at least a factor of six higher than the highest value of 6в1020 cm-2 observed anywhere else in the Vela SNR [31] for the thermal emission fit. Based on the ROSAT data Aschenbach [2] suggested the presence of a central point source, which later was confirmed by Chandra measurements [34]. The spectrum of the proposed compact central source (CCS) CXOU J085201.4-461753 suggests a neutron star as the emitter [23,5,6], which is supported by the absence of any optical counterpart brighter than R26 [30]. If this object is the compact remnant of the supernova which created RX J0852.0-4622 the supernova was of the corecollapse type. Like for the north-western rim the absorbing column density of (3.45±0.15)в1021 cm-2 inferred

1. INTRODUCTION RX J0852.0-4622, referred to as G266.2-1.2 in Green's SNR catalogue (http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/surveys/snrs/), and occasionally as Vela Jr., located at the south-eastern corner of the Vela SNR [2] was one of the discoveries of the ROSAT all-sky survey. It is also the second brightest excess in the 6 years all-sky map of COMPTEL in the 1.157 MeV line emission, called GRO J0852-4642, that coincides with RX J0852.0-4622 [19, 20]. Since the 1.157 MeV line of 44 Ti is exclusively produced in supernovae it is very likely that RX J0852.0-4622 and GRO J0852-4642 are the same object which was created in one supernova explosion. The combined analysis of the X-ray data and the -ray data led to the suggestion that RX J0852.0-4622 could be the remnant


wards the CCS of around 2.5в1021 cm-2 is expected which is not far from the columns measured for the CCS [6]. Concerning the age, there has been the suggestion, that the supernova which led to RX J0852.0-4622 is responsible for a previously unidentified spike in nitrate concentration measured in an Antarctic ice core. The precipitation occurred around the year 1320. Other nitrate spikes could be associated with historical supernovae. One of the issues in this context is of course the detection of the 1.157 MeV line, because together with the 44 Ti yield it dominates the estimate of the age. To get more insight into the questions of distance, age and progenitor of this SNR observations of the X-ray bright rims and of the central region were carried out by XMMNewton [5,6] and by Chandra [4,23,33,34]. Figure 1. The Parkes image (colour) of RX J0852.04622 overlaid with ROSAT PSPC contours (E>1.3 keV). The synthesized beam of the Parkes observations is 5 (lower left corner) with an r.m.s noise (1 ) of 10 mJy. X-ray contours (white) are 0.8, 1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2, 2.3, 2.6 and 3 in units of 10-4 ROSAT PSPC counts s-1 arcmin-2 . from the spectrum of CXOU J085201.4-461753 is significantly higher by a factor of about six (Kargaltsev et al. 2002) than the column densities of 6в1020 cm-2 measured for the Vela SNR by Lu & Aschenbach [29], which suggests that at least CXOU J085201.4-461753 and possibly RX J0852.0-4622 are at a greater distance than the Vela SNR, which is located at a distance of 390±100 pc, as was recomended by Cha & Sembach [7] based on observations of 60 O stars. Pozzo et al. [36] concluded that the distance to RX J0852.0-4622 is 430±60 pc, which is consistent with the distance to the Vela OB2 association that was derived to be 420±30 pc by Woermann et al. [52], or with the distance to the Trumpler 10 (Tr 10) OB association that was derived by de Zeeuw et al. [56]. On the other hand, Redman et al. [37] suggested, as a possibility, that the optical nebula RCW 37 was generated by the blast wave of RX J0852.0-4622 impacting the shell of the Vela SNR, i.e. RX J0852.0-4622 is embedded in the Vela SNR. Moreover, the X-ray spectrum of the rather bright, nebular region C (Fig. 1), which is slightly eastward of CXOU J085201.4-461753 (Fig. 2), has an appearance typical of the Vela SNR shrapnel spectrum [25,26], but has an absorption column of 5.0в1021 cm-2 (Iyudin et al. 2006, in preparation), that is even higher than the column to the CCS. This fact, among others, suggests a high degree of clumpiness of the ISM towards Vela Jr. along different line of sights in this complex region containing a number of molecular, HI and CS clouds [10,31,55,57]. We note, that this high absorption column is derived for the line sight very close to the line sight towards the CCS. If the column of 5.0в1021 cm-2 corresponds to the thickness of two ejecta shells or two walls of the wind bubble, an absorption column to-

Figure 2. XMM-Newton MOS1/2 false color image of the inner 30 arcmin central region of RX J0852.0-4622 (red: 0.3-0.75 keV; green: 0.75-2 keV, and blue: 2-10 keV). The central bright source is CXOU J085201.4-461753. Other 18 point-like sources, marked by circles, are detected in the field of view. The angular bin size of the image is 4 arcsec [6].

2. RADIO OBSERVATIONS Radio observations of RX J0852.0-4622 starting with the publication of Dubner et al. [10] and on the Vela and Gum Nebula regions by Yamaguchi et al. [55], Moriguchi et al. [31] shed light on the SNR immediate environment, demonstrating the presence of a multitude of different clouds in the ISM surrounding the SNR. Especially noteworthy the paper by Dubner et al. [10] that shows HI clouds of an angular size comparable to that of RX J0852.0-4622 whose boundary is likely to be interacting with the RX J0852.0-4622 blast wave (see Fig


3). The presence of many point-like X-ray sources in the vicinity of the forward shock can be used to demonstrate the increase of the absorbing column along the radii going from the center of the SNR to the point source No. 1 near the NW rim. This fact clearly supports the idea of the forward shock just beginning to interact with the outer cloud, presumably the HI cloud discovered by Dubner et al. [10]. Another interesting recent radio result was produced by Reynoso et al. [42] who presented new, more sensistive observations of the RX J0852.0-4622 central region at a few radio frequencies. The major result of their study is that no central radio nebulosity can be found at or near the position of the H nebulosity of Pellizzoni et al. [35]. Instead, a nebulosity was found that is tentatively identified as a "butterfly"-type planetary nebula positioned quite nearby of Wray 16-30, and CXOU J085201.4-461753. The implications of this discovery are not completely clear at the moment, but the previous claim of a PWN type radio nebulosity has been withdrawn [42].

Figure 3. Relative position of the HI cloud near RX J0852.0-4622 found by Dubner et al. (1998), relative to the SNR as a whole, relative to the NW rim of SNR, and to some previously unknown and yet unidentified point-like X-ray sources (Iyudin et al. 2006, in preparation). Only one source (#3) has tentatively been identified with the galaxy 2MASX J08490236-4529375. 3.1. X-ray spectral fits RX J0852.0-4622 is located in the south-eastern corner of the Vela SNR, which actually completely covers RX J0852.0-4622. At low energies the X-ray surface brightness of the Vela SNR is much higher than that of RX J0852.0-4622, so that RX J0852.0-4622 becomes visible only above 1 keV in the ROSAT images. This is a major complication for any spectral fit to RX J0852.0-4622. We have followed three options. In a first approach we chose fields for the background to be subtracted which are definitely outside the area covered by RX J0852.0-4622 but inside the Vela SNR. The corresponding fits did not converge to a unique solution, when different fields for the background were chosen. This is likely to be due to the Vela spectra changing on a scale of a few arcminutes [29]. In a second approach we fit the spectra of RX J0852.04622 with a three component model. This model consists of one thermal component with an associated interstellar absorption column density which together represent the low energy Vela SNR emission; the second component is again thermal emission with an added power law (third component) to represent the higher energy emission. The second and third components have the same absorption column density. This model was applied to the NW rim and the S rim, and the results are shown in Table 2.

3. X-RAY OBSERVATIONS The diameter of RX J0852.0-4622 is 2o which is significantly larger than the 30 field of view of the EPIC instruments on board of XMM-Newton. Four different pointings on the brightest sections of the remnant were carried out in the GTO program, three of which were directed to the rim, i.e. the northwest (NW), the west (W) and the south (S) and the fourth pointing was towards the center (C) (Fig. 2).

Table 1. XMM-Newton XMM GTO observations of RX J0852.0-4622 Rim NW West South Center Pointing RA 08h48m58s 08h47m45s 08h53m14s 08h51m50s (J2000) DEC -45d39m03s -46d28m51s -47d13m53s -46d18m45s Expos. ksec 31.76 35.96 47.13 24.11

The observations were carried out between April 24 and April 27, 2001. The EPIC-PN camera [45] was operated in extended full frame mode and the medium filter was in place. The EPIC-MOS1 and -MOS2 cameras [49] were used in full frame mode with the medium filter as well. Further details of the observations are given in Table 1. These observations take during XMM-Newton revolutions 0252, and 0253, were augmented by observations of the NW rim to calibrate the low energy response of the EPIC PN. We have used some fraction of these observations to analyse the spectra and the radial profile of the NW rim.

As expected from the work of Lu & Aschenbach [29] there is a low temperature component (vmekal1) with a temperature between 37 and 44 eV associated with a column density around 1.3в1021 cm-2 , which is about a


Table 2. Spectral fit results with a wabs(vmekal)+wabs(vmekal+power law) model for the range 0.2E x10 keV. low kT1 high kT2 NH (kT1 ) NH (kT2 ) power law 2 (dof) 2 Region 22 -2 22 -2 (eV) (keV) (10 cm ) (10 cm ) photon index NW rim 37.5+4.0 3.84+1.65 0.138+0.022 0.461+0.023 2.59+0.16 796.48 (777) 1.025 -2.0 -1.30 -0.026 -0.019 -0.07 Southern rim 1 43.5±0.8 2.92±2.50 0.123±0.016 0.471±0.035 2.55±0.25 349.01 (379) 0.92

Table 3. Fit results for Ex 0.8 keV with various spectral models for the continuum including a with and without one or two Gaussian lines. ph. index, or NH radio index 2 (dof) Region Model 22 -2 rollof f , Hz (10 cm ) at 1 GHz NW rim powerlaw 2.60 0.496 -- 166.64 (173) NW rim sresc (2.2+0.4 )в1017 0.389 0.24 157.76 (172) -0.2 NW rim sresc+gauss 2.20в1017 0.389 0.24 147.06 (170) NW rim sresc+2gauss 2.20в1017 0.389 0.24 145.04 (170)

power law, the sresc model
2

0.963 0.917 0.865 0.853

factor of two to three higher than found by Lu & Aschenbach [29]. But the column density for the high temperature (vmekal2 + power law) components is higher by another factor of three to four, which would indicate a larger distance if the spectral model is correct. Formally, i.e. based on 2 (c.f. Table 2), the fits are acceptable for both the NW and S region, with no significant difference of the best fit parameters for the two regions. The power law slopes of 2.59 and 2.55, respectively, and the absorption column densities agree remarkably well with the ASCA measurements [44,48] despite the significantly higher photon statistics and higher energies covered by XMM-Newton. Because of the ambiguity concerning the contribution of the Vela SNR the X-ray spectral analysis is usually restricted to the energy range E>0.8 keV. Figure 4. The deep exposure XMM-Newton EPIC-PN image shows the bright NW part of the RX J0852.04622 clearly resolved, and some new, prviously unknown X-ray point-like sources. This EPIC-PN image was produced from EPIC-PN calibration data taken during XMM-Newton revolutions 0367, 0533, 0534, and 0897. local residuals around 4.4 keV and 6.5 keV that were found from the fit to the GTO data of rev. 0252. By adding one or two Gaussian shaped line(s) gauss at these energies to the sresc continuum model it is possible to further lower 2 [22]. We note that a simple power law model is quite acceptable judging on the total 2 value. We also note that to cover the low energy part of spectrum we need a thermal component which is represented by a vmekal model. We have also analysed the X-ray spectrum of each of the two filaments (c.f. Fig. 4) separately. Both filaments have a power law continuum spectrum for Ex 0.8 keV, which can be also well fitted by the sresc model of XSPEC (c.f. Fig. 5). The line feature at 4.2 keV detected by ASCA [48], is detected by XMM-Newton (Iyudin et al. 2005), and is present in both filaments. The line flux is larger in the brighter (outer) filament, but the line is more clearly detected in the fainter filament. Additionaly, two more lines are clearly observed in the fainter filament, which has a smaller continuum flux than the brighter filament. Note the sharp outer boundary of the remnant and the clear presence of at least two arc-like

3.1.1. The north-western rim Figure 4 shows the XMM-Newton EPIC-PN image of the north-western rim. A bright filament like structure defines the outer edge of the remnant and a second, nonaligned and significantly fainter filament like structure is seen further inside. The two structures seem to join each other at the north-eastern tip. This X-ray image confirms to the image published by Iyudin et al. [22], which resolves the remnant's outer boundary into a number of fine filaments. The image also shows a number of point sources near the NW rim. In an attempt to improve upon the non-thermal component modelling of the spectrum with a straight power law model, we have tried in addition the synchrotron model (sresc) of XSPEC, developed by Reynolds [40,41]. This model represents synchrotron emission from the shock wave accelerated high-energy electrons and which takes care of electron escape or synchrotron losses by a steepening of the spectrum towards higher energies. As can be 2 seen from Table 3 the reduced value is slightly lower than for a straight power law. Figure 5 (left) shows two


Figure 5. Left: PN spectrum of the brightest region of the RX J0852.0-4622 NW rim (region 1). Right: EPIC-PN spectrum of the fainter filament of the NW rim (region 2). The spectra were obtained from a combination of observations dedicated to EPIC-PN calibration (XMM-Newton revolutions 0367, 0533, 0534, and 0897). Spectra were fitted with the sresc+Ngauss model.

Figure 6. Left: EPIC-PN and EPIC-MOS1,2 spectra of the brightest region 1 of the RX J0852.0-4622 southern rim for E> 0.8 keV. Spectra were fitted with a vmekal+sresc+gauss model. Right: MOS spectrum of the western rim for E> 0.2 keV, in comparison. The spectrum was fitted with a 2vmekal+powerlaw+gauss model. features. The fainter one might correspond to the reverse shock, that only starts to develop. One of the line-like excesses, detected in the spectra of NW rim, is also visible in the spectra of the southern and western rims (Fig. 6). Namely, the strongest line at Eline =4.24+0.18 keV of -0.14 the NW reg. 1 for a power law continuum model, and Eline =4.44±0.11 keV for the same region using the sresc model, is also detected in the spectra of the southern and western rims. We confirm, that the emission line feature at 4.2 keV found by ASCA in the NW rim spectrum of RX J0852.04622 is also found in the XMM-Newton data (Fig. 5, 6). Our values of the line energy are slightly higher than the value given by Tsunemi et al. [48], but are consistent with the ASCA SIS0 spectrum of the NW rim (Fig. 4 in the paper [48]). The complete data set of lines is consistent with one value for the line energy common to all three sections of the rim, which is Ex = 4.45 ± 0.05 keV. We believe that the X-ray line at 4.2 keV is a direct consequence of the 44 Ti decay in the SNR shell. The significance values of the line detection depend on the region from which the background model was formed, and not yet conclusive to claim the existence of the line beyond any doubt, although the coincidence of the line energies is rather compelling.

3.1.2. The radial profile of the NW rim The new, combined EPIC-PN image of the northern rim of RX J0852.0-4622 is shown in Figure 7. A structure of rectangular boxes is overlaid. For each individual box radial profiles across the rim were constructed. The radial profiles clearly show the presence of the SNR for-


ward shock and of the juvenile reverse shock. The profile shown on the very right side of Fig. 7 is likely to contain two filaments that may constitute the forward shock. It will be interesting to follow up this profile structure with better statistics and angular resolution. Chandra also observed this part of the NW rim [4,33]. By fitting the radial profiles with a suitable function Bamba et al. [4] derived the magnetic filed in the forward shock. The magnetic field and the angular size of the forward shock were used by Bamba et al. [4] to constrain the distance and the age of Vela Jr. SNR. Values cover the range from 420 yr to 1400 yr for the SNR age, and from 260 pc to 500 pc for the SNR distance. These estimates of the age and of the distance to SNR are not strongly dependent on the ambient number density or the ejecta mass, and can therefore accomodate ejecta masses of both type Ia and core-collapse SNe. Although the allowed parameter regions are too broad to derive strong conclusions, it is possible to state that indeed Vela Jr. is a nearby and young SNR.

limit, which is about three times as high as the flux measured with COMPTEL [27]. Moreover, if estimates of the Vela Jr. ejecta velocity made by COMPTEL is indeed about 15.000 km/s [19], the chances to detect the 1.157 MeV line are fairly low due to the very large Doppler width of the line. The chance to detect line emission from GRO J0852-4642 with SPI is reasonabley high only for the line of excited 44 Sc at 78 keV. In this specific case the detection at 3 significance is expected for good quality exposures of 7в106 seconds. Hopefully this integrated exposure time will be reached in 2007. The X-ray emission line feature at 4.2 keV found by ASCA [48] in the NW rim spectrum of RX J0852.0-4622 was confirmed by XMM-Newton data (Fig. 4, 5, and [22]), and by Chandra [4]. The XMM-Newton spectra of the SNR western and southern rims show the line as well, at an energy which is consistent with that of the NW rim. The complete set of X-ray lines detected by ASCA, Chandra and XMM-Newton is consistent with one value for the line energy common to all three sections of the rim, which is Ex = 4.45 ± 0.05 keV. The detections of X-ray line from all X-ray bright rims of GRO J0852-4642 is pointing to a more or less homogeneous distribution of the line emitter along the SNR forward shock rims. Quite unfortunately, this spatial distribution of the line emission over the SNR makes the detection of the 68 keV and 78 keV lines of 44 Sc from GRO J0852-4642 by IBIS-ISGRI quite difficult. To detect the 44 Sc lines IBISISGRI needs to accumulate an exposure equivalent of a few 108 seconds in the most optimistic scenario of the SN explosion, e.g. if the 44 Ti is contained in a few well defined clumps of the SNR ejecta. If the 44 Ti mass is rather smoothly distributed (diluted) along the outer rim of expanding ejecta, and this is the case that is indicated by the X-ray line detections, the detection of the Sc lines at 68 keV and 78 keV will even need an order of magnitude higher exposure, which is out of reach. To estimate the exposure time of ISGRI one is advised to have a look at the paper by Renaud et al. [39] where the extended source detection by ISGRI is critically evaluated. Note that the situation is completely different for the Cas A SNR where the 44 Sc distribution is consistent with a point-like excess for IBIS-ISGRI. This explains the relatively easy detection of the two 44 Sc lines by IBIS-ISGRI [40,51], while the high velocity of the ejecta containing 44 Ti (8000 km/s) makes a detection by SPI of the 78 keV line from Cas A quite a demanding excercise [9,51].

3.2. The western rim While the NW rim spectra are quite distinct from the underlying thermal emission of the Vela SNR that is dominating at Ex 0.8 keV, the western rim spectra for Ex 0.8 keV show apart from a steep power law component with a photon index of 4.7 an additional thermal component, which is characterized by NH (2.84±0.15)в1021 cm-2 and kT0.2 keV. Both the power law and the thermal component are significantly different from those of the NW and S rim. We note that the PN observation of the W rim was heavily contaminated by solar proton flare events that lowered the effective exposure by a factor of three when the good time interval selection process was applied. The MOS spectra were not strongly affected by the soft protons and confirm the line emission at 4.4±0.18 keV, also for the western rim. The western limb shows up in the X-ray image of ROSAT as the X-ray bright feature W (Fig. 1). We note that the radio emission from this part of RX J0852.0-4622 at 2420 MHz is rather weak. This low radio-continuum emission is consistent with the fit to the X-ray spectrum (Fig. 5, right), which reveals a relatively small contribution of synchrotron radiation in this region of the SNR.

4. GAMMA-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF VELA JR. 4.2. VHE -ray observations 4.1. INTEGRAL results and expectations There have been numerous discussions about the significance of the 1.157 MeV line detection from this SNR (see e.g. [3,21,22,43] and it is obvious that an independent confirmation of the detection is needed. First attempts made with INTEGRAL have so far produced an upper Recently H.E.S.S. published results of the first of likely many more observations of this shell-type SNR [1]. The spectrum derived by H.E.S.S. from RX J0852.0-4622 in the energy range of 0.5 TeV to 8.0 TeV is a power-law with a photon index of 2.1. The earlier observation by CANGAROO-II of the NW rim of RX J0852.0-4622 and


30 20

20

Counts

10

Counts
10 10 20 30

10

20

30

Radial Distance (arb. Units)

Radial Distance (arb. Units)

Figure 7. Overlay of the X-ray image and a grid of rectangular boxes used to build radial profiles of the SNR NW rim (left). Examples are shown for box #3 (middle of figure) and box #5 (right); box counting is from left to right. The profile of box #5 shows fine filaments in the radial profiles of the SNR NW rim. early results [24] are now revised after much longer observation of the whole SNR by CANGAROO-III and improved data analyses [15]. The latest spectral shape of RX J0852.0-4622 derived by CANGAROO-III in the energy range from 1.0 TeV to 5.0 TeV is consistent with that of H.E.S.S.. The multiwavelength spectrum of the SNR involving the radio, X-ray and VHE -ray observations still does not really constrain the origin of the high-energy emission of this SNR. Both, leptonic and proton models of the highenergy emission are allowed by fits to the multi- spectrum [1]. contain 44 Ti (Nomoto et al. [32], and references therein). Moreover, in recent observations of "ordinary" type Ia SNe high-velocity features in the early spectra of SNe were discovered [47]. Thus the question on the nature of the SN that gave birth to RX J0852.0-4622 remains unanswered. The puzzle is waiting for to be solved.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Authors acnowledge comments of the anonymous referee that helped to improve the quality of the paper. The XMM-Newton project is an ESA Science Mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and the USA (NASA). The XMMNewton project is supported by the Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung / Deutsches Zentrum fur Ё Ё Luft- und Raumfahrt (BMBF / DLR), the Max-PlanckGesellschaft and the Heidenhain-Stiftung.

5. GRO J0852-4642 SPECTRUM AND PROGENITOR The spectral shape measured with XMM-Newton from RX J0852.0-4622 is basically the same as what has been measured with ASCA. The ASCA and recent Chandra measurements indicate the presence of an emission line like feature at around 4.1 - 4.2 keV. The XMM-Newton data confirm such a feature, and it seems to be present everywhere on the remnant's rim. The line energy averaged over the three observational fields is 4.45 ± 0.05 keV. We attribute this line or lines to the emission of Ti and Sc which might be excited by atom/ion or ion/ion collisions. The X-ray line flux expected from such an interaction is consistent with the 1.157 MeV -ray line flux measured by COMPTEL. This consistency of the Xray line flux and the -ray line flux lends further support to the existence and amounts of Ti in RX J0852.0-4622 claimed by Iyudin et al. (1998) and to the suggestion that RX J0852.0-4622 is young and nearby [3]. Iyudin et al. [19] quote a very large broadening of the 1.157 MeV ray line which would indicate a large velocity of the emitting matter of about 15.000 km/s. Previously we believed that such a high ejecta velocity for Ti is found only in explosion models of sub-Chandrasekhar type Ia supernovae [28,54]. More recent calculations of core-collapse SNe models with jet-like ejecta from the pole regions show high-velocity components of around 15.000 km/s, which

REFERENCES [1] Aharonian, F., et al., 2005, A&A, 437, L7 [2] Aschenbach, B., 1998, Nature, 396, 141 [3] Aschenbach, B., Iyudin, A.F., Schonfelder, V., 1999, Ё A&A, 350, 997 [4] Bamba, A., Yamazaki, R., and Hiraga, J.S., 2005, ApJ, 632, 294 [5] Becker, W., and Aschenbach, B., 2002, astroph/0208466 [6] Becker, W. et al., 2006, astro-ph/0607081 [7] Cha, A. N., & Sembach, K.R., 2000, ApJS, 126, 399 [8] Combi, J.A., Romero, G.E., Benaglia, P., 1999, ApJ, 519, L177 [9] Diehl, R., 2006, astro-ph/0609429 [10] Dubner, G.M., et al., 1998, AJ, 116, 813 [11] Duncan, A.R., Stewart, R.T., Haynes, R.F., and Jones, K.L., 1995, MNRAS, 277, 36


[12] Duncan, A.R., Stewart, R.T., Haynes, R.F., and Jones, K.L., 1996, MNRAS, 280, 252 [13] Duncan, A.R., Haynes, R.F., Jones, K.L., and Stewart, R.T., 1997, MNRAS, 291, 279 [14] Duncan, A.R., and Green, D.A., 2000, A&A, 364, 732 [15] Enomoto, R., Watanabe, S., Tanimori, T., et al., 2006, astro-ph/0608422 [16] Filipovic, M.D., Jones, P.A., Aschenbach, B., 2001, AIPC-565, 267 [17] Iyudin, A.F., et al., 1994, A&A, 284, L1 [18] Iyudin, A.F., et al., 1997, ESA-SP382, 37 [19] Iyudin, A.F., et al., 1998, Nature, 396, 142 [20] Iyudin, A.F., 1999, Nucl. Physics, A654, 900c [21] Iyudin, A.F., 2000, Proc. of Workshop "Astronomy with Radioactivities", Schloss Ringberg, Kreuth, Germany, September 29 - October 2, 1999, MPE Report 274, 65 [22] Iyudin, A.F., et al., 2005, A&A, 429, 225 [23] Kargaltsev, O., et al., 2002, ApJ, 580, 1060 [24] Katagiri, H., et al., 2005, ApJ, 619, L163 [25] Katsuda, S., and Tsunemi H., 2005, PASJ, 57, 621 [26] Katsuda, S., and Tsunemi H., 2006, ApJ, 642, 917 [27] von Kienlin, A., Attie, D., Schanne, S., et al., Proc. ґ of the 5th INTEGRAL Workshop 'The INTEGRAL Universe', Munich, 16-20 February 2004, acc. for publication in ESA SP-552, astro-ph/0407129 [28] Livne, E., Arnett, D. 1995, ApJ, 452, 62 [29] Lu, F.J., and Aschenbach, B., 2000, A&A, 362, 1083 [30] Mignani, R.P. et al., 2006, astro-ph/0608025 [31] Moriguchi, Y. et al., 2001, PASJ, 53, 1025 [32] Nomoto, K., et al., 2006, astro-ph/0605725 [33] Pannuti, T.G., et al., 2005, Proc. of the Conf. "XRay and Radio Connections" published electronically by NRAO, http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/events/xraydio (eds. L.O. Sjouwerman and K.K. Dyer), held 3-6 February 2004 in Santa-Fe, New Mexico, USA, [34] Pavlov, G., et al., 2001, ApJ, 559, L131 [35] Pellizzoni, A., Mereghetti, S., and De Luca, A., 2002, A&A, 393, L65 [36] Pozzo, M., Jeffries, R.D., Naylor, T., et al., 2000, MNRAS, 313, L23 [37] Redman, M.P., et al., 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1093 [38] Renaud, M., Vink, J., Decourchelle, A., et al., 2006, ApJ, 647, L41 [39] Renaud, M., Gros, A., Lebrun, F., et al., 2006, A&A, 456, 389 [40] Reynolds, S.P., 1996, ApJ, 459, L13 [41] Reynolds, S.P., 1998, ApJ, 493, 375 [42] Reynoso, E.M., et al., 2006, A&A, 449, 243

[43] Schonfelder, V. et al., 2000, AIP Conf. Proc. Ё AIP510, 54 [44] Slane, P. et al., 2001, ApJ, 548, 814 [45] Struder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al., 2001, Ё A&A, 365, L18 [46] Stupar, M., et al., 2005, AdSpR, 35, 1047 [47] Tanaka, M., Mazzali, P.A., Maeda, K., Nomoto, K., 2006, ApJ, 645, 470 [48] Tsunemi H., et al., 2000, PASJ, 52, 887 [49] Turner, M.J.L., Abbey, A., Arnaud, M., et al., 2001, A&A, 365, L27 [50] Vink, J., et al., 2001, ApJ, 560, L79 [51] Vink, J., 2005, AdSpR, 35, 976 [52] Woermann, B., Gaylard, M.J., Otrupcek, R., 2001, MNRAS, 325, 1213 [53] Woosley, S.E., Weaver, T.A., 1994, ApJ 423, 371 [54] Yamaguchi, N. et al., 1999, PASJ, 51, 765 [55] de Zeeuw, P.T. et al., 1999, AJ, 117, 354 [56] Zinchenko, I., Mattila, K., & Toriseva, M., 1995, A&ASS, 111, 95