Yes, please
Andrew Gelman says,
Instead of “confidence interval,” let’s say “uncertainty interval”
Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ
îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà
: http://hea-www.harvard.edu/AstroStat/slog/groundtruth.info/AstroStat/slog/tag/quote/index.html
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sat Mar 1 10:20:56 2014 Êîäèðîâêà: koi8-r Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: aircraft |
Weaving together Astronomy+Statistics+Computer Science+Engineering+Intrumentation, far beyond the growing borders
Posts tagged ‘quote’
Andrew Gelman says,
Instead of “confidence interval,” let’s say “uncertainty interval”
Really, there is no point in extracting a sentence here and there, go read the whole thing:
“Why I don’t like Bayesian Statistics”
- Andrew Gelman
Oh, alright, here’s one:
I can’t keep track of what all those Bayesians are doing nowadays–unfortunately, all sorts of people are being seduced by the promises of automatic inference through the “magic of MCMC”–but I wish they would all just stop already and get back to doing statistics the way it should be done, back in the old days when a p-value stood for something, when a confidence interval meant what it said, and statistical bias was something to eliminate, not something to embrace.
From IMS Bulletin Vol. 36(7) p.10, TerenceÁ€™s Stuff: Changing my mind (again)
Continue reading ‘[Quote] Changing my mind (again)’ »
From IMS Bulletin Vol. 36(3), p.11, Terence’s Stuff: Model skeptics
[Once I quoted an article by Prof. Terry Speed in IMS Bulletin: Data-Doctors. Reading his columns in the IMS Bulletin provides me an opportunity to reflect who I am as a statistician and some guidance for treating data. Although his ideas were not from astronomy or astronomical data analysis, I often find his thoughts and words can be shared with astronomers.]
Continue reading ‘[Quote] Model Skeptics’ »