Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://crydee.sai.msu.ru/ftproot/pub/misc/doc/monitors Дата изменения: Thu Mar 21 19:45:40 1996 Дата индексирования: Sun Apr 10 04:28:43 2016 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: millennium

Subject: Re: Best 17" Monitor?
Date: 27 Dec 1995 18:38:43 GMT
Organization: Help Sweden
Lines: 79
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14

In article <4brlak$bqt@a3bsrv.nai.net>, psklenar@nai.net says...
>
>Larry Hess <72202.2324@CompuServe.COM> writes:
> >
> >What are your recommendations for a 17" monitor? I've downloaded
> >some articles, but I'd like to hear from owners.


Now I have finaly bought a monitor !

I have considered the following monitors:
Nokia445X
Nokia 447X
Philips 21BA
Philips 15A
Nec XE17
Nec XP17
Mag MXP17F
Mag MXP17S
Hitachi CM1711
Samsung 17GLsi

My goal was to find a flickerfree monitor. This demands
minimum 110Hz refresh rate.
The above monitors can do this refresh rate at some resolution.
What resolution is best? For me 17" and 800x600 resolution
is the best choice.

I have tested those monitors (with Matrox MGA millenium) at high
refresh rate:
Nokia 447V
Nec XP17
Mag MXP17S
Samsung 17GLsi

Result:
Nokia 447V, is underqualified for testing. (Bad)

Nec XP17 , expencive and terrible ! Flicker at all
refresh rates!

Mag MXP17S , very good, but trinitron tube = two lines
over the display. I can not accept that.

Samsung 17GLsi, excellent! Big surprice for me, for
less money , you get the best monitor!

So, I bought the Samsung 17GLsi. I had to return 2, but the third
monitor was OK.

I have set the refesh rate to:
640x480 115Hz
800x600 115Hz = My default resolution.
1024x768 100Hz
1152x870 95Hz
1280x1024 93Hz

The Samsung 17GLsi monitor I have now is not 100% perfect.
My verdict for the Samsung 17GLsi:
Geometry; GOOD
Convergence; OK..GOOD
Resolution; OK at 800x600
Moire; VERY GOOD
Focus; GOOD
Screen regulation; VERY GOOD
Picture stabilty; VERY GOOD
EMI; VERY GOOD

Compare my verdict for the NEC XP17:
Geometry; VERY BAD
Convergence; BAD
Resolution; OK
Moire; VERY BAD
Focus; BAD
Screen regulation; GOOD
Picture stabilty; VERY BAD
EMI; -



From: Bo.Lundberg@mailbox.swipnet.se (Mr Lundberg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
Subject: Re: Big monitor test , .. Corrected info!
Date: 28 Dec 1995 06:55:56 GMT
Organization: Help Sweden
Lines: 14
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.14

In article <4bs453$efo@mn5.swip.net>, Bo.Lundberg@mailbox.swipnet.se
says...

So, I bought the Samsung 17GLsi. I had to return 2, but the third
monitor was OK.

I have set the refesh rate to:
640x480 115Hz
800x600 115Hz = My default resolution.
1024x768 95Hz NOT 100
1152x870 93Hz NOT 95
1280x1024 74Hz NOT 93 My memory faild me!