Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~uochep/talks/talks06/vlcws-brau.pdf Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Tue Aug 1 23:43:04 2006 Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Tue Oct 2 11:27:39 2012 Êîäèðîâêà: Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: þæíàÿ àòëàíòè÷åñêàÿ àíîìàëèÿ

Report of the ALCPG
· · · · ALCPG Objectives Detector Concepts Report Beyond the DCR Detector R&D

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006

1


ALCPG Charge
Charge of May, 2002 (update language ­ see ALCPG web page) establish and manage process toward experimental program at the ILC demonstrate that physics program is feasible ensure collaboration with larger global effort coordinate working groups
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Define physics program ­ study benchmark reactions Define detector requirements of physics program Evaluate detector options Establish documentation system Set milestones and hold regular meetings Encourage and facilitate participation

ALCPG is physics and detectors subcommittee of the LCSGA
2

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006


Grannis, HEPAP. July 2006
3

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006


ALCPG Executive Committee
Jim Brau (Oregon), co-chair Jim Alexander (Cornell) JoAnne Hewett (SLAC) Young-Kee Kim (Fermilab) Hitoshi Murayama(Berkeley) Rick Van Kooten (Indiana) Mark Oreglia (Chicago), co-chair Marcel Demarteau (Fermilab) Dean Karlen (Victoria) David MacFarlane (SLAC) Bruce Schumm (Santa Cruz) Harry Weerts (Argonne)

Responsible for carrying out charge of May 2002 (updated language) establish and manage process toward experimental program at the ILC demonstrate that physics program is feasible ensure collaboration with larger global effort coordinate working groups ALCPG is physics and detectors subcommittee of the LCSGA
4

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006


ALCPG Detector Working Groups
Detector and Physics Simulations:
Norman Graf, Michael Peskin

Vertex Detector:
Marco Battaglia, Jim Brau

Tracking:
Bruce Schumm, Dean Karlen , Keith Riles

Particle I.D.:
Bob Wilson

Calorimetry:
Dhiman Chakraborty, Jose Repond, David Strom

Muon Detector:
Gene Fisk, Paul Karchin

Parallel sessions at VLCW06 organized by these conveners Executive Committee will be renewing the charge to these working groups in the coming weeks

Data Acquisition and Trigger:
Usha Mallik

Interaction Regions, Backgrounds:
Tom Markiewicz, Stan Hertzbach

IP Beam Instrumentation:
Mike Woods, Eric Torrence, Dave Cinabro

Test Beams
Gene Fisk, Jae Yu
5

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006


ALCPG Physics Working Groups
New structure created for VLCW06
Terascale Physics: Heather Logan, Hooman Davoudiasl, Tim Barklow, Keith Riles Precision: Doreen Wackeroth, Aurelio Juste, Frank Petriello Cosmology: Dan Hooper, Ted Baltz, Rene Ong
Parallel sessions at VLCW06 organized by these conveners

ILC/LHC: David Rainwater, William Trischuk, Tim Tait, Jim Alexander
6

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006


Concept Efforts are Developing
GLD

4t h Concept

Current set of concepts formed beginning in 2004
LDC http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006

7


Detector Outline Documents


4 Outline Documents were prepared in Spring 2006 leading up to the Bangalore LCWS Contents Description of the detector concept Performance estimates w.r.t. physics benchmarks Required R&D and its status Rough costing estimate



See http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/concepts
8

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006


The GDE Plan and Schedule
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Global Design Effort
Baseline configuration

Project

Detector Outline Documents

Reference Design

LHC Physics
Technical Design ILC R&D Program Bids to Host; Site Selection; International Mgmt
July 20, 2006 9

Detector Concept Report (issued w/ RDR)
ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

J. Brau


Detector Concept Report
· WWS has established teams of editors for the companion volume, the DCR
­ Physics editors - K. Moenig, A. Djouadi, M. Yamaguchi, Y. Okada, M. Oreglia, J. Lykken ­ Detector editors ­ T. Behnke, C. Damerell, J. Jaros, A. Miyamoto ­ Cost analysis of the concepts ­ M. Breidenbach, H. Maki, H. Videau ­ interacting with GDE Cost Board

·

Active during VLCWS06
http://www.linearcollider.org/wiki/doku.php
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 10


Detector Concept Report
· Physics · Concepts
­ Based on four detector concept DOD's The goal: ­ We can do the ILC physics ­ We have different and complementary solutions ­ We have a clear vision on how to reach the goals (R&D) ­ We have some understanding on the cost for these detectors

· Integrated presentation of Concepts · Case for Two Detectors/IRs

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006

11


Case for Two Complementary Detectors
· · · · · · Confirmation and Scientific Redundancy Complementarity, Collider Options Competition Efficiency, Reliability, Insurance Sociology, Scientific Opportunity Historical lessons
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0508141/proc/papers/PLEN0059.PDF

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006

12


Beyond the DCR
· GDE plans TDR at end of 2009 · Experiments must remain on same timeline as machine Detector TDRs ~2010 ? "synchronize" detectors with the machine · TDRs require significant resources over time
­ 2 years? or more?

· How do we get there?
­ Downselect of detectors? ­ Authority to do this? ­ Intermediate step? CDR? ­ Discussion in WWS-OC and with GDE
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 13


Detector R&D - WWS
· WWS created the Detector R&D Panel
­ collect information on projects world-wide ­ strengthen coordination and prioritization
­ J-C. Brient (IN2P3), CJS Damerell (RAL), R. Frey(Oregon), HankJoo Kim (Kyungpook Natl), W. Lohmann (DESY), D. Peterson (Cornell), Y. Sugimoto (KEK), T. Takeshita (Shinshu U), H. Weerts (ANL)

· R&D Panel prepared the R&D report to accompany the GDE machine Baseline Configuration Document early this year
­ supported by concepts and R&D teams
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 14


Detector R&D - WWS
· R&D Panel Report
­ Draft circulated beginning in January ­ Report updated in April & posted on WWS web page
· http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/wwstudy/R&D Report-final.pdf · Urgent needs require $32M and 1870 man-years over next 3-5 years - globally · Established support over 3-5 years $15M and 1160 man-years - globally · Translating man-years to dollars ($100k/man-year)
­ $33M/yr established over 4 years, $22M/yr more required

· Support notably behind in North America and Japan

· Discussing now review of R&D
­ With GDE R&B Board and WWS-OC
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 15


University Detector R&D in US
This year was the fourth year of support for detector R&D from the agencies since it was first organized by the LCSGA (formerly USLCSG) and the ALCPG

FY05 LCDRD funds $700,000 ­ DOE $117,000 ­ NSF
24 projects 25 universities

FY06 LCDRD funds $1,048,000 - DOE $ 300,000 - NSF
34 projects 26 universities/labs

http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/fy05-awards.html http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/fy06-awards.html
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 16


FY07 University Detector R&D in US
We are organizing ourselves in anticipation for increased funding in FY07 ­ discussed $3M (5 year R&D plan being developed by ALCPG) Encourgement led to developing a proposal early for a few (9) high priority, urgent efforts (~$1M) followed by annual round for another $2M Supplemental proposal 1 ­ call for abstracts (received 22) 2 ­ selection of highest priorities/urgent needs (9)
http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/supplement-06a.html
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 17


Supplemental LCDRD Proposal
Process under the auspices of the LCSGA
1 ­ abstracts (received 22) totaling about $10M over 2 years 2 ­ selection of highest priorities/urgent needs (9) selection made by Oreglia/Weerts/White/Karlen, chaired by Brau consensus by four made it unnecessary for chair to "vote"

Proposal will be submitted to DOE/NSF review to decide on funding of projects
http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/supplement-06a.html
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 18


Supplemental LCDRD Proposal
SELECTION CRITERIA 1. Is the focus of the R&D project addressing a critical need of the ILC detectors?
1. critical, very high priority 3. useful 2. important, priority 4. irrelevant

2. What does this project provide which is unique to the ILC detector R&D effort? 3. How urgent is the planned R&D with the support proposed? Consider a realistic level of support that might come from the supplemental program over 2 years, as well as the base support. Are there urgent steps being taken by this R&D?
1. extremely urgent 3. needed eventually 2. important, but only mildly urgent 4. not needed at all

4. Deliverables - will the R&D supported with the funding result in significant deliverables?
What deliverables?

5. Rating - overall quality of the research plan and goals, and the strength of the team to carry out the objectives
1. excellent 3. satisfactory 2. good 4. poor

http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/supplement-06a.html
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 19


Supplemental LCDRD Proposal
· · · · · · · · · High Performance Digital Hadron Calorimetry for the International Linear Collider PI - J. Repond Development of a Silicon-tungsten Test Module fo an Electromagnetic Calorimeter PI - R. Frey TPC Development PI - D. Peterson Pixel Vertex Detector R&D for Future High Energy Linear e+e- Colliders PI - C. Baltay Energy Spectometers for the International Linear Collider PI - E. Torrence/M. Hildreth Pixel-level Sampling CMOS Vertex Detector for the ILC PI - G. Varner Detector to Measure the Beam-strahlung Gammas PI - W. Morse Long Shaping-Time Silicon Microstrip Readout PI - B. Schumm Scintillator Based Muon System R&D PI - P. Karchin

2 2 3 1 1

VXD TRK CAL Muon LEP

This resulting distribution was not by design

http://physics.uoregon.edu/~lc/lcdrd/supplement-06a.html
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 20


FY07 LCDRD Proposal
FY07 proposals will be accepted for continuing and new projects from DOE/NSF funding One year proposals (third year of 3 year cycle) Anticipated timeline
December 15, 2006 ­ status reports and new project descriptions due May ­ awards announced - revised budgets/descriptions September, 2007 ­ funded year begins
details will be posted on ALCPG web page comments are welcomed by all members of the ALCPG exec comm
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 21


Tale of Two Colliders
· There are continuing discussions here on the relationships between the LHC and the ILC · The success of the LHC will be a big boost to our field and to our ILC aspirations · How do the different first LHC discovery scenarios impact the decision on the ILC? · Workshop on this topic being planned for fall at Fermilab

J. Brau

ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC

July 20, 2006

22


Future Meetings
· Valencia
­ ECFA/GDE

November, 2006 February, 2007 June, 2007 Next summer/fall

· Beijing
­ ACFA/GDE

· Hamburg · Fermilab

­ LCWS 2007 (joint with GDE)

­ Joint GDE / ALCPG meeting
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 23


COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOP
· Tuesday the communications workshop here in Vancouver explored our common understandings of many aspects of the communications effort · We need to all use the common message · LCSGA Communications Committee (chaired by J. Bagger) developing this effort · Resources will be available to support our efforts
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 24


ILC Communications

B. Barish, July 18, 2006

· We must communicate the ILC story very effectively if we are too succeed with this ambitious undertaking
­ We must convince our colleagues in HEP; the broader scientific community; the funding agencies; policy makers and the general public of the reasons for and benefits of building the ILC ­ The communications program must be totally INTERNATIONAL ­ TOOLS: We will need hand-out materials; talk materials; write articles; make personal presentations, etc. ­ Our "campaign" will begin in earnest when the ILC Reference Design is released early next year. It must be aimed at communicating the excitement and value of the project, with the goal of making a successful funding proposal in about 2010

· So, what's the ILC story we want to tell ???
­ Our story is the same at all levels! The level of detail is different.
25


Begins and ends with the Science

The Elements of our Story

B. Barish, July 18, 2006

"Science First" Tools
Experiments & Science
26


CHARGE to the WORKSHOP
· Study and advance the compelling physics case · Advance plans for experiments through discussions of detector R&D and concept design issues
­ ­ ­ ­ LCTPC meeting ­ Tuesday GLD meeting - Wednesday LDC meeting ­ Saturday 12:30, SUB 212A SiD meeting ­ Sunday 9-1, SUB 205

· Consider schemes to move from DCR to TDR · Learn to engage broader community through communications, education and outreach
­ Communication workshop - Tuesday

· Joint GDE / WWS discussions
­ R&D, MDI, 2 IRs/Detectors, Costs, TDRs
J. Brau ALCPG Workshop ­ Vancouver, BC July 20, 2006 27