Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.hist.msu.ru/Departments/RusHis19/Staff/tarasov/Tarasov_ray.pdf Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Thu May 7 13:38:21 2015 Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 17:15:00 2016 Êîäèðîâêà: Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: m 94

.. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682
doi

« »: ( )
: . ­ , . . - , , . . ­ . - , . , , . , . . , «» . , : , , . - , , , . . . . . : , , , , , , , , , . Annotation: The article is a study on the sense of nature in the Medieval man. The given research problem is a particular topic in the larger scientific problem ­ the research of mentalities, i.e. the socio-psychological setting, habits, consciousness, ways of thinking of people of one or another period. In a larger context the study of the perceptions of nature is one of the possible means to understanding the outlook of a person from the past. For the purpose of this analysis only one aspect of this question was chosen that of the development of historiographical perceptions of the sense of beauty in nature before Peter the Great in Russia. The first part of the article contains a general theoretic-methodological survey, illuminating the problem of the Medieval individual's perception of the outside world. It is shown that the study of the relations towards nature in that period was tied with certain difficulties, which were caused by the particularities of the sources. The reconstruction is based on the analysis of book-learning and partially figurative material, i.e. it reflects not so much the general perception of society, as much as of a narrow group of "creators" of elitist culture. At the same time, the very character of the sources allows to make the conclusion that that perception of nature differed with the modern one: the questions of outlook attracted a lot more attention than interest in specific points of space, landscape. The emotional-aesthetic experience of nature also existed, however it was most likely of secondary importance. In the second part of the article, the author demonstrates the becoming of the historiographical outlook in relation to the study topic. It shows the main milestones in the development of scientific understanding of the relationship between the Russian Medieval individual and nature from the time of N. M. Karamzin and up to modernity. Key words: nature, book-learning, Middle ages, historiography, aesthetics, Old Rus', landscape, scenery, outside world, mentalities. « - », 8825, « : , , , , ».
526
© NOTA BENE ( «-»)



« » XI ., . « », « » , : « , , , . <...> [] , , , , » [25]. (. 2:15) : «, [ ] , , » [25]. , , . . . , « » : « , , , , » [27, 113]. ­ , , [2, 26­36]. , . , . . , , . . ­ ( , , . .),



DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682 ­ , , , , . , . , «-» , , . «», «», « », « » , . . «». : , , , , . . . , «"" <...> » [3, 200]. ( -, . , , « -». . « ». . . : « " " , . . . <...> , , "", , » [34, 11].) , , . (, , . .),
527

© NOTA BENE ( «-»)


: 5 (23) · 2014
DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682 . , [17, 26­58; 43, 105­109]. «», - «» ( ), . , , , , . «», , , , . . . , - XII­XV . , «» , , [21, 113]. , - . «» XVI­XVIII . « ­ , . » [15, 118]. , . , , (, ) (, , , ). , , (XVI .), ( XV .). ­ .
528

, , . , XV . [28, 430­431], , , [30, 27­34]. c , . XVII . [16, 107­114]. - . , , ; , , [9, 9]. XIV . [36, 194­201]. . , . . « » ( 16 « » 1803 .) , « ( ); , ...» [12, 261]. « . 14 » ( 4 « » 1803 .) . . ­ , « » [13, 265]. XVIII­XIX ., . , -

© NOTA BENE ( «-»)



DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682 , [1, 7]. . . , , , . . : «... , , , , . , , ­ . <...> , , , , , » [11, 30]. « » , , , « , », « , », , [11, 32­33]. . . . , « , ­ , , ­ ; . , , , , ; , , ». , . , « » [45, 235­265]. . . , , , « ». : «... , . , , <...> , » [26, 438­439]. . , , : , . . ( . [7, 10­38].) , , , . , , , 1970- ., «» . . . . « » . . , , , ­ , « , » [20, 156]. , . , . XVII . [20, 156]. . . . , , , ,
529

© NOTA BENE ( «-»)


: 5 (23) · 2014
DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682 ­ , : « , " "». , , , XVI . . « XVII . , , », ­ . . [19, 154]. , « » . . , , , ­ , (, .), , «» : « » [18, 44]. . . , , . . , , , « , » [31, 3­18]. , , . . . , XVII . , . , , : 1668 . « , , ». , ­ ­ [6, 115­122]. 1840- ., , , .
530

, , XVII . , ­ [42, 27­ 28]. . . , , , , « », . . , , . («») ­ [42, 156­157]. 1980- . , , . , . . , ­ « , », : « (, , , ) XII . : " , ..." "", , , , , » [33, 586]. « » . . XVI . . : « [ ] "", a expressis verbis : " , , , , , , , , , "» [29, 87]. . . ,

© NOTA BENE ( «-»)



DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682 , « » [14, 155]. , 1980- . - . « ­ » [44, 272]. « : » (.: , 1995). « » . . , , . , : « , , , » [10, 4­18]. . . . . , , - -, . XI­XII . . , , , . XIII . , . XIV . XV . , . , , . . , XIV . . , , (, ), , «» « », . XVI ., , , , , . ( 1640- .) - , , [38, 19­87]. XVI . , , , [37, 197]. 1990- . . , . , . «» , . 1996 . «- . XI­XVII ». , . . , « » . « , , » , [39, 8­10].
531

© NOTA BENE ( «-»)


: 5 (23) · 2014
DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682 , , . . . « XI­XVII . » [19]. . . [40, 144­ 157; 41, 94­108]. , , , . , , , , , : « , , , . , , » [41, 108]. 1998 . . . « » [5]. - 1970­1990- ., . . , , . , XI­XIII . , . , XVI­XVII ., : , ­ , , , , , , , , , [22, 122­125]. . . : «», , «». , , ,
532

- . « . , - () » [4, 258]. , . . : « , , , , , » [8, 314]. , . . . , «» , : « , " ", , : , , » [8, 303­304]. . . , ­ . , [23]. . . , , . , - « » , «». , «» , « - , , (. " ", " "), , - , » [35, 414­419]. -

© NOTA BENE ( «-»)



DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682 . , . , , XVII ., « » . , , , : «... , , , , , , , » [24, 92­102].
:

. ­ , . . , , , . , .

1. . . - XVIII ­ XIX .: ..........,2008.30. 2. ..«»// .2010.1..26­36. 3. . .] XI ­ XIII : . - // [ ..;.:,1941..1..195­208. 4. ....:,1998.399. 5. ....:,1998.847. 6. . . XVII ­ XVIII . ,,..:,1977.296c. 7. .«»1920­1930-:// .2007.88..10­38. 8. ..:XI­XIII..:,,2007.510. 9. . . XIV­XVI . . . ... . ,2007.35. 10. . . « » // : ..:,1995..4­18. 11. ...:.,1873.260. 12. ..:..:,1988.527. 13. . . . 14 // . . :..:,1988.527. 14. .,.:..:,2003.304. 15. ..«»:-XVI­XVIII. .:-,2010.563. 16. ..XVII­XVIII.//.V..2013..2(11)..107­114. 17. . . XI­XIII . // :.1998..:,1998..1..26­58. 18. ..:-..:,1982.344. 19. ..XI­XVII...:,1973.254. 20. ....:,1970.180. 21. ..XII­XV..:,2000.206. 22. . . : . . : : « » // . .7...1999.4..122­125. 23. . « » // . 2009. 17 // [ ] ­ URL:http://art.1september.ru/view_article.php?id=200901710(:28.11.2014). 24. .,//..: ,2003..54..99­102. 25. .//[]­URL:http://www.hesychasm.ru/library/nikita/disq_paradise.htm (:28.11.2014). 26. . . ( ) // ..:,1928..433­439.
© NOTA BENE ( «-»)

533


: 5 (23) · 2014
DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682
27. ..// .2014.26..112­117. 28. [ . .] . (1530-­1580-.)://..;.:,1945..2..415­431. 29. ....:,1984.206. 30. . . . XV­XVI . .: , 2009. 277. 31. ..(,..-..)//XVII­XVIII..:,1976..231­242. 32. ..XI­XV.//..:,1981..3. .5­18. 33. ....:,1987.783. 34. ..-( )..:,2007.431. 35. ....:-,2011.703. 36. ..//.«».2011.4..194­201. 37. ..XI­XVIII:..: ,2009.259. 38. . . XI ­ XVIII . // : ..:,1995..19­87. 39. -.XI­XVII/.....:,1996.560. 40. .. II.§3. // ..:,1994..144­157. 41. ..//..:,1992..94­108. 42. ..:..:,2010.174. 43. ..«»//..2002.3(9)..105­109. 44. ..//..:,1987..272. 45. ..: ,1881.378.

534

1. Anikeichik E. A. Nravstvenno-esteticheskoe znachenie peizazha v russkoi literature kontsa XVIII ­ nachala XIX vv.: ot sentimentalizmakpredromantizmu.Avtoref.diss....kand.filolog.nauk.M.,2008.30s. 2. olkovinskiiS.A.Opredeleniekontsepta«Priroda»vsovremennoifilosofiiprirody//Problemasootnosheniyaestestvennogoi V sotsial'nogovobshchestveicheloveke.2010.1.S.26­36. 3. [Gudzii N. K.] Perevodnaya literatura XI ­ nachala XIII veka: Glava Kh. Estestvenno-nauchnye sochineniya // Istoriya russkoi literatury.M.;L.:Izdatel'stvoANSSSR,1941.T.1.S.195­208. 4. DanilevskiiI.N.DrevnyayaRus'glazamisovremennikovipotomkov.M.:AspektPress,1998.399s. 5. DeminA.S.Okhudozhestvennostidrevnerusskoiliteratury.M.:Yazykirusskoikul'tury,1998.847s. 6. Demin A. S. Russkaya literatura vtoroi poloviny XVII ­ nachala XVIII veka. Novye khudozhestvennye predstavleniya o mire, prirode,cheloveke.M.:Nauka,1977.296c. 7. Dmitriev A. «Akademicheskii marksizm» 1920­1930-kh godov: zapadnyi kontekst i sovetskie obstoyatel'stva // Novoe literaturnoeobozrenie.2007.88.S.10­38. 8. DolgovV.V.BytinravyDrevneiRusi:MirypovsednevnostiXI­XIIIvv.M.:Yauza,Eksmo,2007.510s. 9. DoninA.N.PeizazhvnemetskomiskusstveXIV­XVIvekov.Avtoref.diss....doktoraiskusstvovedeniya.NizhniiNovgorod,2007. 35s. 10. Eleonskaya A. S. «Drevesnye obrazy» v proizvedeniyakh drevnerusskoi literatury // Drevnerusskaya literatura: izobrazhenie prirodyicheloveka.M.:Nasledie,1995.S.4­18. 11. ZabelinI.KuntsovoidrevniiSetunskiistan.M.:IzdanieK.Soldatenkova,1873.260s. 12. amzinN.M.Zapiskistarogomoskovskogozhitelya:Izbrannayaproza.M.:Moskovskiirabochii,1988.527s. Kar 13. amzin N. M. Puteshestvie vokrug Moskvy. Pis'mo pervoe iz Kolomny ot 14 sentyabrya // Karamzin N. M. Zapiski starogo Kar moskovskogozhitelya:Izbrannayaproza.M.:Moskovskiirabochii,1988.527s. 14. KimN.,svyashchennik.Raiichelovek:NasledieprepodobnogoNikityStifata.SPb.:Aleteiya,2003.304s. 15. Kirillina S. A. «Ocharovannye stranniki»: arabo-osmanskii mir glazami rossiiskikh palomnikov XVI­XVIII stoletii. M.: Klyuch-S, 2010.563s. 16. Kir'yanova S. A. Kompozitsionnaya rol' peizazha v russkoi ikone vtoroi poloviny XVII ­ pervoi treti XVIII v. // Vestnik PSTGU. SeriyaV.Voprosyistoriiiteoriikhristianskogoiskusstva.2013.Vyp.2(11).S.107­114. 17. LaushkinA.V.StikhiinyebedstviyaiprirodnyeznameniyavpredstavleniyakhdrevnerusskikhletopistsevXI­XIIIvv.//Russkoe Srednevekov'e:Knizhnayakul'tura.1998.M.:Manufaktura,1998.Vyp.1.S.26­58. 18. LikhachevD.S.Poeziyasadov:Ksemantikesadovo-parkovykhstilei.L.:Nauka,1982.344s. 19. LikhachevD.S.RazvitierusskoiliteraturyXI­XVIIvekov.Epokhiistili.L.:Nauka,1973.254s.
© NOTA BENE ( «-»)

References (transliterated):



20. LikhachevD.S.ChelovekvliteratureDrevneiRusi.M.:Nauka,1970.180s. 21. MaletoE.I.KhozheniyarusskikhputeshestvennikovXII­XVvv.M.:IRIRAN,2000.206s. 22. Millionshchikova T. M. Retsenziya: Demin A. S. O khudozhestvennosti drevnerusskoi literatury: Ocherki drevnerusskogo mirovedeniya: Ot «Povesti vremennykh let» do Sochinenii Avvakuma // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnayaliteratura.Seriya7.Literaturovedenie.Referativnyizhurnal.1999.4.S.122­125. 23. Mil'chikM.Kakoemesto«ugodnokmonastyrskomustroeniyu»//Iskusstvo.2009.17//[Elektronnyiresurs]­URL:http:// art.1september.ru/view_article.php?id=200901710(dataobrashcheniya:28.11.2014). 24. amura E. Priroda v zhitiyakh svyatykh, russkikh i yaponskikh // Trudy otdela drevnerusskoi literatury. SPb.: Pushkinskii Nik Dom,2003.T.54.S.99­102. 25. Nikita Stifat. Traktat o rae // [Elektronnyi resurs] ­ URL: http://www.hesychasm.ru/library/nikita/disq_paradise.htm (data obrashcheniya:28.11.2014). 26. ol'skayaA.Kvoprosuopeizazhevdrevnerusskoiliterature.(Neskol'koopisaniivesny)//Sbornikstateivchest'akademika Nik AlekseyaIvanovichaSobolevskogo.L.:Izdatel'stvoANSSSR,1928.S.433­439. 27. Olenich L. V. Roskosh' v russkom khudozhestvennom soznanii Srednevekov'ya i Novogo vremeni // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogouniversitetakul'turyiiskusstv.2014.26.S.112­117. 28. lov A. S.] Literatura vremeni obrazovaniya mnogonatsional'nogo Russkogo gosudarstva. Vremya Ivana Groznogo (1530-e ­ [Or 1580-egg.):Vvedenie//Istoriyarusskoiliteratury.M.;L.:Izdatel'stvoANSSSR,1945.T.2.S.415­431. 29. anchenkoA.M.Russkayakul'turavkanunPetrovskikhreform.L.:Nauka,1984.206s. P 30. opovG.V.RukopisnayaknigaMoskvy.MiniatyuraiornamentvtoroipolovinyXV­XVIstoletiya.M.:Indrik,2009.277s. P Pr 31. okof 'ev N. I. K literaturnoi evolyutsii vesennego peizazha (Kirill Turovskii, I. M. Katyrev-Rostovskii i V. K. Trediakovskii) // NovyechertyvrusskoiliteratureiiskusstveXVII­nachalaXVIIIvv.M.:Nauka,1976.S.231­242. 32. okof 'evN.I.FunktsiyapeizazhavrusskoiliteratureXI­XVvv.//LiteraturaDrevneiRusi.M.:MGPI,1981.Vyp.3.S.5­18. Pr 33. ybakovB.A.YazychestvoDrevneiRusi.M.:Nauka,1987.783s. R 34. Simonov R. A. Matematicheskaya i kalendarno-astronomicheskaya mysl' Drevnei Rusi (po dannym srednevekovoi knizhnoi kul'tury).M.:Nauka,2007.431s. 35. olovM.N.Printsipraya.M.:Progress-Traditsiya,2011.703s. Sok 36. Starkova E. A. Analiz razvitiya zapadnoevropeiskoi zhivopisi peizazha // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta.Seriya«Pedagogika».2011.4.S.194­201. 37. Uzhankov A. N. O spetsifike razvitiya russkoi literatury XI ­ pervoi treti XVIII veka: Stadii i formatsii. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury,2009.259s. 38. Uzhankov A. N. Evolyutsiya peizazha v russkoi literature XI ­ pervoi treti XVIII vv. // Drevnerusskaya literatura: izobrazhenie prirodyicheloveka.M.:Nasledie,1995.S.19­87. 39. Khudozhestvenno-esteticheskayakul'turaDrevneiRusi.XI­XVIIveka/Podred.V.V.Bychkova.M.:Ladomir,1996.560s. 40. KhudushinaI.F.GlavaII.§3.Esteticheskayavyrazitel'nost'prirodyvkul'turesrednevekovoiRusi//Estetikaprirody.M.:Institut filosofiiRAN,1994.S.144­157. 41. Khudushina I. F. Osobennosti esteticheskogo vospriyatiya prirody v srednevekovoi Rusi // Perevodnye pamyatniki filosofskoi myslivDrevneiRusi.M.:InstitutfilosofiiRAN,1992.S.94­108. 42. hernyiV.D.Russkiesrednevekovyesady:opytklassifikatsii.M.:Yazykislavyanskoikul'tury,2010.174s. C 43. ShaikinA.A.«Sitsaznamen'yanenadobro»//DrevnyayaRus'.Voprosymedievistiki.2002.3(9).S.105­109. 44. ShchemelevaL.M.Peizazh//Literaturnyientsiklopedicheskiislovar'.M.:Sovetskayaentsiklopediya,1987.S.272. 45. akhontovIv.ZhitiyasvyatykhsevernorusskikhpodvizhnikovPomorskogokrayakakistoricheskiiistochnik.Kazan':Tipografiya Y Imperatorskogouniversiteta,1881.378s.

DOI: 10.7256/2222-1972.2014.5.14682

© NOTA BENE ( «-»)

535