Pictures - an Astronomy Net Eyepieces Forum Message

Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/eyepieces/messages/490.shtml
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 01:54:49 2016
Êîäèðîâêà:
Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: çàïðåùåííûå ñïåêòðàëüíûå ëèíèè

Eyepieces Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Eyepieces \| Post	Login

Pictures

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Greg Eckes on November 2, 2003 08:06:40 UTC

Thanks Jarvis for the info. I am planing on rebuinling my scope. You have given me some good ideas.

The only problem I am having is to understand why my secondary is placed so far back. I have read that on way to set the offset is to move the secondary mirror back. The best way is forward and down from the center of the tube. I figure Coulter must have knowen what he was doing. I wish I could talk to him. I guess I will have continue to do more research.

Greg

Follow Ups:

Secondary offset - jkoptic - November 2, 2003 - 18:30 UTC
- Secondary offset - gjeckes - November 2, 2003 - 21:41 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins