Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.com/news/2004/12/new-kid-on-the-block
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 03:32:32 2016
Êîäèðîâêà: ISO8859-5

Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: arp 220
New kid on the block | Astronomy.com
Tonight's Sky
Sun
ò??
ò??
Sun
Moon
ò??
ò??
Moon
ò??
ò??
Mercury
ò??
ò??
Mercury
ò??
Venus
ò??
ò??
Venus
ò??
Mars
ò??
ò??
Mars
ò??
Jupiter
ò??
ò??
Jupiter
ò??
Saturn
ò??
ò??
Saturn
ò??

Tonight's Sky ò?? Change location

OR

Searching...

Tonight's Sky ò?? Select location

Tonight's Sky ò?? Enter coordinates

ÒÀ '
ÒÀ '

New kid on the block

Astronomers may have discovered the universe's youngest known galaxy.
I Zwicky 18
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope imaged what may be the youngest galaxy ever seen. Dwarf galaxy I Zwicky 18 (left) may not have begun active star formation until about 13 billion years after the Big Bang. A companion galaxy (right) may be interacting with it, triggering the "late bloomer's" star creation.
NASA, ESA, Y. Izotov (MAO, Kyiv, UA) and T. Thuan (University of Virginia)
December 1, 2004
Using the Hubble Space Telescope's Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS), an international team of astronomers believes it has identified a "boy among men." Surrounded by older galaxies, I Zwicky 18 is a dwarf galaxy that could be only 500 million years old, making it the youngest known galaxy.

Located 45 million light-years away, I Zwicky 18 is significantly closer to our galaxy than other young galaxies. In comparison, the Milky Way Galaxy is 12 billion years old, the typical age of galaxies across the universe.

"This is extraordinary because one would expect young galaxies to be forming only around the first billion years or so after the Big Bang, not some 13 billion years later," explains Trinh Thuan of the University of Virginia, who coauthored the study featured in The Astrophysical Journal with Yuri Izotov from the Kiev Observatory. "And young galaxies were expected to be very distant, at the edge of the observable universe, but not in the local universe."

The team believes the galaxy is young because a survey of Hubble data didn't reveal any stars older than 500 million years. Also, the study showed the galaxy lacks elements heavier than helium — indicating no successive generations of stars have existed and, subsequently, manufactured heavier elements through nuclear fusion.

Another team of astronomers contends the galaxy is slightly older. Goran Ostlin of the Stockholm Observatory and Mustapha Mouhcine of the University of Nottingham used Hubble's Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS) to find a population of cool, red stars slightly older than the stars imaged by the team led by Thaun and Izotov. Ostlin and Mouchine estimate the age at 1 billion years — still relatively young. Their study will be published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

However, the dispute over I Zwicky 18's age resolved, a deeper mystery remains: Why is this galaxy such a late bloomer in star formation? Thaun and Izotov describe this galaxy as resting in an "embryonic state as a cold, gas cloud of primeval hydrogen and helium." Although astronomers have no definite answer, one theory holds that an encroaching galaxy may have prompted I Zwicky 18 into making stars. Gravitational disturbances between these galaxies may have caused hydrogen clouds to collapse, and creating stars.
0

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

Read and share your comments on this article
Comment on this article
Want to leave a comment?
Only registered members of Astronomy.com are allowed to comment on this article. Registration is FREE and only takes a couple minutes.

Login or Register now.
0 comments
ADVERTISEMENT

FREE EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Receive news, sky-event information, observing tips, and more from Astronomy's weekly email newsletter.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
asy_gravitational_eguide

Click here to receive a FREE e-Guide exclusively from Astronomy magazine.

Find us on Facebook