Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.asc.rssi.ru/RadioAstron/publications/articles/cr_2014,52,391.pdf Дата изменения: Tue Oct 7 14:31:11 2014 Дата индексирования: Sat Apr 9 23:55:27 2016 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: mercury surface

ISSN 0010 9525, Cosmic Research, 2014, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 391­392. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2014. Original Russian Text © M.Yu. Arkhipov, I.S. Vinogradov, S.B. Novikov, S.D. Fedorchuk, 2014, published in Kosmicheskie Issledovaniya, 2014, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 428­429.

Numerical Modeling of RadioAstron SRT Temperature Deformations
M. Yu. Arkhipov, I. S. Vinogradov, S. B. Novikov, and S. D. Fedorchuk
Astro Space Center, Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia e mail: rusengineer@mail.ru
Received December 16, 2013

Abstract--The results of modeling the thermal deformations of a space radio telescope's reflecting surface are presented in the paper. Calculations were performed for the versions of the most unfavorable telescope illumination by the Sun. DOI: 10.1134/S0010952514050025

One of the main factors that influence the accuracy of space radio telescope's (SRT) reflecting surface in orbit are temperature deformations of the structure. At the same time, the surface accuracy should meet very high requirements [1]. However, the size of the mirror in the working state does not allow one to perform ground based thermal vacuum tests while monitoring the full volume of deviations in the reflecting surface. The only way to estimate temperature deformations and deviations in the reflecting surface as a whole at the orbital operation stage is numerical modeling. Calculation Model We used the finite element technique in the MSC.Nastran software implementation as the main computational method. The finite element model includes the models of 27 petals, a central part, a reflector farm, a science payload container, and a tran sition farm. The total number of components in the model is 49 821, the number of items is 47 247. The model was developed taking into account the possibil ity of using it, not only for deformation analysis, but also for thermal analysis. In addition, for higher reli ability of the results, the temperature fields were calcu lated by software for domestic development. This has greatly reduced labor consumption and increased the accuracy of the results. The verification of a calcula tion model and the adequacy of its real structure is a significant problem. The works on verifying calcula tion models can be subdivided into three directions. The first direction is associated with formal checks of the model, which are standard in the finite element modeling. These checks include the following: (1) the control of initial data, including character istics of materials, the cross section, the thickness of components, etc.;

(2) the control of integrity of the grid, the absence of degenerated elements and elements with nonopti mal geometry; (3) the analysis of parasitic thermal stresses and the frequency of natural oscillations of a free structure, the response at applying unitary loads, etc. These checks have accompanied works on model ing the strain state at all modeling stages because the calculation model has undergone changes in the course of these works. The second type includes the complex of works associated with the analysis of the effect of initial data (characteristics of materials, boundary conditions, design features) on the response (deflections of a reflecting surface) of the calculation model. In fact, this direction of verification comb the whole experience gained in the course of works on modeling the deformations. The third and most valu able direction of verification is the comparison of numerical modeling results with the results of field tests. These were vibration dynamic tests of the item 1410 (the SRT model for vibration dynamic tests), for which good coincidence was obtained between the results of tests and numerical modeling results [2]. Good coincidences were also obtained for the static loading of the same item in the course of works on controlling the accuracy and repeatability of mirror opening. The thermal vacuum tests of individual pet als carried out at the ESTEC test center of the Euro pean Space Agency in 1994 and 1998 turned out to be very useful for developing the calculation techniques. Boundary Conditions Different versions of temperature fields caused by SRT orientation relative to the Sun were considered to be the boundary conditions for final calculations. Below, we present the results for the two most typical versions, i.e., illumination from the side of the Naviga tor service module at the angle of 15° to the longitudi

391


392 ­95.6 ­92 ­99.3 ­102.9 ­110.1

ARKHIPOV et al. ­117.4 1.164 ­106.5 ­113.8 ­121. 0.958 0.752 0.547 0.341 0.135 ­0.0704

Z Y
Fig. 1. Fig. 2.

nal axis of the spacecraft (SC) (the estimated case X15) and illumination perpendicular to the longi tudinal axis of the SC (the estimated case Z0). As an example, Fig. 1 presents the field of temperatures on reflector's petals for the estimated case X15; the most considerable drop of temperatures is observed on two petals shadowed by solar battery panels. RESULTS The table presents the results of final modeling of temperature deformations for estimated cases of SC orientation relative to the Sun. CONCLUSIONS The deviations in the reflecting surfaces of the SRT are presented for two characteristic cases of tempera ture fields caused by the orientation of the SC relative
Table. Deviations along the normal Maximum Minimum Root mean square Orientation relative to the Sun X15 +1.16 mm ­0.07 mm 0.40 mm Z0 +1.00 mm ­0.138 mm 0.29 mm

to the Sun. The maximum deviations (in addition to temperature deformations), which included manufac turing errors, alignment inaccuracies, opening inac curacies, and deviations caused by the features of the behavior of composite materials under space condi tions, did not exceed 2.0 mm for either version of SRT orientation relative to the Sun. The RadioAstron project has been carried out by the Astro Space center of the Lebedev Physical Insti tute of the Russian Academy of Sciences and by the Federal State Unitary Enterprise (FSUE) Lavochkin Association under contract with the Russian Space Agency, jointly with many scientific technological organizations in Russia and other countries. REFERENCES
1. Kardashev, N.S., Khartov, V.V., et al., RadioAstron A telescope with a size of 300000 km: Basic parameters and first results of observations, Astron. Zh., 2013, vol. 90, pp. 179­222. 2. Arkhipov, M.Yu., Vinogradov, I.S., Kardashev, N.S., and Usyukin, V.I., The Radioastron project as a contri bution to collaboration of the SM1 department of Bau man MGTU with AKTs FIAN, Vestnik MGTU im.N.E.Baumana, Ser. Mashinostroenie, 2012, pp. 49­ 59.

Translated by Yu. Preobrazhensky
COSMIC RESEARCH Vol. 52 No. 5 2014